Updated October 25, 2026
| Name | Kive |
| Overview | Kive is an innovative AI-powered visual library and organizational tool designed specifically for creatives. It helps users seamlessly collect, organize, and share their sources of inspiration. With its advanced search functionalities, Kive enables users to locate files swiftly and effectively, surpassing the traditional reliance on file names. Directors, designers, photographers and other creatives can use it to support research and production. The earlier article’s 300% speed claim is not an independently verified benchmark or a guaranteed outcome. Kive promotes collaboration through shared workspaces where teams can easily exchange feedback, and it is accessible through a web browser. Current product pages also describe AI image/video creation and reusable product and style workflows, alongside the visual-library functions. |
| Key features & benefits |
|
| Use cases and applications |
|
| Who uses? | Creatives such as directors, designers, and photographers. |
| Pricing | The Free offer includes 40 credits after email verification and five boards. Monthly plans checked on October 25, 2026 show Basic $40 per month with 2,000 credits and two users, and Pro $100 per month with 5,000 credits and ten users. Enterprise is custom-priced, with an advertised 150,000-plus credit tier. Annual offers and yearly-only unlimited top-ups are not included in these monthly prices; check usage and storage limits for the selected plan. |
| Tags | AI visual library, organizational tool, creative workflow, content creation. |
| App available? | Kive is available through its browser-based service. No official standalone native mobile app was verified in the reviewed sources; similarly named apps from other publishers are not evidence of Kive access. |
Sources: Current plan comparison · Current creation and product-workflow scope · Official reusable creative workflows
Historical image: The existing Kive homepage collage and tagline identify its earlier creative-library offering. They are not a benchmark of research speed or a current plan comparison.
