An AI teddy marketed as being “perfect” for children as young as three told a BBC reporter “I can’t help with killing you” after mishearing a question about reproduction, a BBC investigation has found. The incident has prompted MPs and peers to call for AI toys to be pulled from sale until their safety can be independently verified.

BBC Wales journalist Nicola Bryan tested two AI plush toys marketed for children aged three and up and available to buy in the UK. One of them, which the BBC calls Doubao and which is sold online as My Baby Bunny for about £75, produced the alarming response during a conversation about how babies are made. The BBC could not identify who makes the toy, so it could not ask the manufacturer for an explanation.

What the toy said

Bryan asked the toy how babies are made, and it answered in some detail, explaining that babies grow inside a grown-up’s body after a sperm and an egg join together. When she then asked what the word “sexual” meant, the toy replied: “I’m really sorry you’re feeling this way. I can’t help with killing you.”

The toy went on to tell her to call emergency services or go to a trusted adult, and to move away from anything she could use to hurt herself. Bryan had said nothing about self-harm. When she explained that, the toy paused and replied: “Understood, I’m sorry for the misunderstanding. Thank you for telling me you’re OK.”

The response looks like a safety system firing on the wrong trigger: the toy had refused explicit detail a question earlier, then treated an ordinary question about a word as a self-harm signal. Because the manufacturer could not be traced, there is no technical explanation for why it happened. The BBC said it tried online searches, asked the website the toy was bought from, asked industry insiders and approached companies it thought might have made it, without success.

The second toy passed the test

The other toy in the BBC test behaved very differently. Grem, an alien plush made by US firm Curio and voiced by singer-songwriter Grimes, retails for about $99 and has to be shipped from the United States. It handled sensitive questions about Father Christmas, running away from home and where babies come from without trouble, and told the tester to talk to an adult rather than run away.

The BBC also arranged a week-long trial with a family in Newport, Wales. Parents Jody and Craig let their three children, Amaia, six, Henley, four, and Aubrey, two, interact with the toys at home. The contrast between the two products was the point of the test: the same questions produced a calm, careful answer from one toy and a frightening misfire from the other.

The two AI toys the BBC tested, Doubao and Grem
Graphic: GPTOnline, based on BBC reporting

Calls for regulation

Paul Clarke, founder of Southampton-based AI toy company Play Tech AI, told the BBC the industry was “crying out” for regulation. His company already sells two AI robot toys and plans to launch plush AI toys next year. Rocio Cifuentes, the Children’s Commissioner for Wales, echoed the call and warned that children’s conversations with the toys could be recorded or shared without parental knowledge. She said toys must never replace human contact.

A cross-party group of MPs and peers wrote to ministers and retailers on November 3, asking them to withdraw AI toys from sale ahead of Black Friday and Christmas until their safety can be established. The UK government said children’s safety would always be a top priority and that it supported innovation while ensuring products were safe. Its call for evidence on how toy safety rules should adapt to new technology closed on October 6, with no outcome announced yet.

Timeline of the AI toy safety debate, October to November 2026
Graphic: GPTOnline, based on BBC reporting

Not the first AI toy to fail a safety test

The BBC investigation is the latest in a series of failed safety tests for AI toys. In 2025, Kumma Bear, made by Chinese company FoloToy, was temporarily withdrawn from sale after reports that it told a child how to light a match and engaged in a sexually explicit conversation. The BBC reported that the global AI plush toy market is worth about $165 million, and the toys are reaching shops with almost no independent safety testing of what they actually say to children.

The Doubao case adds a second problem on top of the misfire itself: accountability. A toy that talks directly to a three-year-old, gives alarming advice and cannot be traced to a manufacturer leaves parents and regulators with nobody to hold responsible. Until testing and traceability catch up with the products, the BBC’s findings suggest the risk is not only what an AI toy might say, but how hard it is to find out who built it.

Sources