The retained image is an earlier ShortlistIQ public landing page identifying its AI hiring assistant. The free-trial call to action does not establish unlimited free applicant screening or independently validated hiring outcomes.
Updated October 25, 2026
AI-assisted interviews and screening reports for human review.
| Name | ShortlistIQ |
|---|---|
| Overview | ShortlistIQ is an innovative AI-powered recruitment platform designed to transform the hiring process. By automating first-round interviews through conversational AI, it allows HR professionals to focus on strategic tasks. The provider promotes consistent candidate evaluation, but bias-free outcomes are not independently established. Employers remain responsible for reviewing results and lawful hiring decisions. Customizable AI assistants can be tailored to reflect an organization’s culture and values, providing a personalized and engaging candidate experience. |
| Key Features & Benefits |
|
| Use Cases and Applications |
|
| Who Uses? |
|
| Pricing |
The public pricing page lists Basic at $49/month (20 invited applicants, one AI assistant), Standard at $199/month (200 applicants, unlimited assistants, advanced AI scoring, comprehensive analytics and priority support), and Premium at $599/month (2,000 applicants, dedicated account manager and onboarding). Unlimited job positions are listed for all three. These are displayed dollar amounts; the page offers monthly and yearly recurring plans, so confirm the selected billing interval and final total before purchase. A free account is advertised for testing with up to 10 applicants, without a credit card—not an unlimited free hiring plan. The paid applicant allowances are per month. No checkout or candidate assessment was performed. |
| Tags | AI Recruiting, Candidate Screening, HR Technology, Conversational AI, Talent Acquisition, Recruitment Automation |
| App Available? | No dedicated mobile app available; platform accessible via web browser. |
Pros and Cons
Provider claims and interface features are not independent evidence of hiring accuracy, fairness or emotional understanding. Review candidate data, scoring and decisions with appropriate human oversight; do not use generated scores as the sole decision basis.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Automates recruitment screening process | Limited customization options |
| Reflects organizational culture | Could miss non-verbal cues |
| Provider comparison to human analysis is not independently validated | Potential non-empathetic responses |
| Strategic questioning functionality | Lack of offline functionality |
| Simulates real interview experience | May oversimplify candidate evaluation |
| Values emotional intelligence | Relies on quality of CVs |
| Multilingual capabilities | Doesn’t support all languages |
| Improves HR efficiency | No mentioned integration with HRMS |
| Bias-reduction claim requires validation in the actual hiring context | May alienate non-tech-savvy candidates |
| Interactive calculators for forecasting | No apparent candidate feedback system |
| Creates in-depth scoring reports | |
| Interacts with candidates personally | |
| Quick assistant customization | |
| Can simulate different interview styles | |
| Fairness of individual assessments requires human review | |
| Demonstrates high interaction cues | |
| Helps in setting hiring targets | |
| Potential time savings depend on workflow | |
| Multilingual interview simulation | |
| Simulates human typing speed | |
| Demonstrates interaction cues | |
| Scoring reports generated |
Sources: Provider overview · Pricing and free account · Service terms · Website terms







