Updated October 17, 2026
Screenshot of UnAIMyText’s official homepage, captured October 18, 2026. Source: official website. The interface is shown before submitting text; this is not a tested rewrite or detector result.
UnAIMyText is a web-based rewriting tool from CoreAI LLC for editing AI-assisted drafts. It offers controls intended to adjust phrasing, tone and flow. It is best evaluated as an editing aid: a rewritten paragraph still needs a person to check its facts, meaning, sources and suitability for the audience.
This article reviews public product information and policies. We have not submitted text, tested detector results, created an account or purchased a plan.
Features and current free limits
The official homepage, updated October 12, 2026, advertises free Standard-mode use without registration or a credit card, with 500 words per input. That applies to visitors and free accounts. The provider advertises no cumulative word cap, but its fair-use terms allow capacity-related limits; “free” should not be read as guaranteed uninterrupted access.
The site describes language and tone controls, including formality and creativity settings, and advertises support for more than 30 languages. Pro adds Ultra mode and larger inputs. These are advertised capabilities, not evidence that every language or rewrite preserves meaning perfectly.
A free account adds saved history. If you only need to revise an occasional short passage, compare that convenience with the privacy implications of saving your text.
Paid plans and purchase checks
The homepage’s public pricing selector displays these monthly offers:
- Basic: $9.99/month. Standard mode, 1,000 words per input and 30,000 words per month, with history and sentence-level rephrasing. Ultra and document uploads are excluded.
- Pro: $14.99/month displayed beside a crossed-out $24.99. Includes Standard and Ultra, 2,000 words per input, 100,000 words per month and PDF/DOCX uploads.
The dollar currency code, taxes, promotional end date and future renewal price are not stated in that selector. Confirm them in the purchase summary; the displayed discount is not a guaranteed renewal price.
An older official plan comparison still shows a 450-word visitor limit in the retrieved version, while the current homepage and pricing selector show 500. Use the current input counter and purchase offer rather than assuming every page is synchronized.
Paid monthly allowances and the free tier’s advertised repeated uses are different limits. Confirm how reruns consume your allowance, whether unused words expire and how cancellation works before subscribing.
The refund policy permits requests within seven days of purchase only when fewer than 2,000 words have been used on the account. It excludes later requests, usage at or above that threshold, and certain abuse or terms-violation cases. A refund request requires proof of purchase; the policy describes processing through Stripe. This is not an unrestricted trial or guaranteed refund for every purchase.
A useful editing workflow
The provider’s use-case page suggests emails, articles, social posts, product descriptions and scripts. The practical value is the opportunity to compare another wording with your draft, rather than an obligation to accept every change.
Fictional example, written for this article: an event organizer wants to simplify an announcement. An original draft might read, “We wish to inform attendees that registration will conclude on Friday.” A possible manual revision is, “Registration closes on Friday.” Neither sentence is an observed UnAIMyText output.
- Set the purpose. Decide who needs the information and what they should understand or do.
- Remove sensitive details. Use placeholders for private names, account information or confidential figures when those details are not needed for editing.
- Keep a copy of the original. Compare the rewrite against it rather than judging fluency alone.
- Check every commitment. Dates, prices, conditions, uncertainty and promises must still mean the same thing. In the example, do not add a closing time unless it is known.
- Restore your own voice. Keep only changes you would actually say. Retain source citations and disclose AI assistance when required.
For a long document split across submissions, also read the combined version for repeated introductions, inconsistent terminology and broken transitions.
Detector scores, originality and responsible use
The terms and fair-use policy explicitly avoid promising universal AI-detector bypass. The site’s own published performance figures are vendor claims, not an independent test conducted for this review. We do not repeat them as an expected result.
Rewording does not establish authorship, make borrowed ideas yours or remove citation obligations. It also does not prove factual accuracy or guarantee search rankings. Judge the final text by what it communicates and whether it meets the rules of the setting where it will be used.
For coursework, follow the institution’s AI-assistance policy. Do not present prohibited AI-assisted work as unaided writing. The service’s terms also prohibit automated bulk use through bots or scripts and restrict copying or redistributing the service.
Privacy and saved history
The privacy policy distinguishes signed-out and signed-in use. It says signed-out text is not retained after the result is returned, while recent signed-in humanizations are saved in account history. The provider says submitted content is not sold, shared with third parties or used for model training, and that human staff do not review it.
These are policy commitments, not independently verified security guarantees. The same policy describes Google Analytics, session cookies, sign-in profile information and Stripe payments. Its claims about submitted text should not be broadened into a claim that the website processes no personal data.
No precise history-retention duration or detailed history-deletion timetable was established in the reviewed policy. Ask the provider before using confidential client material. The service says it is not directed to children under 13.
Who should consider UnAIMyText?
It may suit writers who want another way to edit short, non-sensitive drafts and are prepared to review the result. It is a poor fit when the requirement is a guaranteed detector score, automatic fact-checking, confidential-document assurance or proof of original authorship. No dedicated mobile-app listing was verified; the reviewed product is accessed through its website.
Compare it with other options in our AI tools directory, focusing on editing controls, actual limits and data handling rather than promises of undetectability.
